Windows Server licensing is expensive. Costs quickly mount that can impact operations, especially when IT departments need to undertake an upgrade of their Active Directory server(s). For a small and medium-sized enterprise (SME), a five-figure expenditure like this can acutely restrict what IT is able to accomplish in a given year. What\u2019s more, the costs aren\u2019t only financial: IT might not be as effective in enabling other departments to be more productive themselves given the time and effort this kind of administrative work might entail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Speaking as a former IT director, this scenario feels all too personal: considering a big expenditure like this incites a moment of dread, but a decision must be made because the application server that your domain controller runs on has become too long in the tooth. You put it off as long as you reasonably could, even though your MSP partner probably has been nagging you to upgrade your hardware. A new server that can meet your sizing and specification requirements<\/a> will cost five figures. And surprise \u2026 since you last needed to look, Microsoft has modified its licensing regime to function on a per core basis<\/a> (not to mention every other Client Access License you need). The server rig will now cost you over $5,000 more than you anticipated, just to license Windows and avoid an unwelcome audit<\/a> from Microsoft.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And that’s just the beginning. You probably haven\u2019t updated the version of your virtualization platform since you bought your server (and the new version requires downtime for a migration). Opportunity cost, time, and budget will get swallowed up by your server infrastructure. Not to mention, you\u2019ll be paying for your partners to come on-site for a day to set up that hardware. Those visits usually result in side conversations regarding an upgrade to your network hardware.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This is a real-life example \u2026 ouch.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
It\u2019s worth taking a look at the advantages of newer cloud alternatives to either (i) replace the domain controller or (ii) extend what existing technology investments provide. JumpCloud\u2019s open directory platform works cross-OS to manage devices either independent of a domain controller or alongside domain joined devices. For instance, it\u2019s possible to manage single sign-on<\/a> (SSO), deploy multi-factor authentication<\/a> (everywhere), keep devices up-to-date with centralized patch management<\/a>, offer remote assistance<\/a> to your users, and configure secure RADIUS<\/a> logins to Wi-Fi through JumpCloud. These systems aren\u2019t just best practices: they\u2019re required by insurers and to comply with regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Your Microsoft licensing budget can be better spent elsewhere. For example, my IT department\u2019s highest priorities<\/a> did not involve managing servers; instead, we needed to complete our ERP implementation. This affected manufacturing, which is how the company made its money. Spending money on server licensing wouldn\u2019t advance that objective or help us grow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
JumpCloud\u2019s open directory platform can be a standalone replacement for Windows domain controllers or complement Active Directory and Azure Active Directory, depending on your setup, to establish holistic identity and device management. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
JumpCloud offers a variety of Professional Services<\/a> to help ease the load your employees face. Or, if you’re ready, sign up for a trial of JumpCloud today<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"