Two-factor authentication (2FA) can prevent network infiltration, but organizations may refrain from adopting it for reasons such as the integration work it would require, complications with requiring it on different operating systems, applications, network entry points, etc. But is there an alternative to 2FA that\u2019s just as capable of securing a network?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The short answer is no. Though there may be supplementary tools to secure your network, none can reliably secure identities like requiring multiple factors for authentication. Read on to find out why.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Two-factor authentication was introduced as a way to keep IT resources like networks and accounts secure. It\u2019s a combination of something you know (your credentials) with something you have (a randomized, numerical code retrieved from your device, or a USB key), or something you are (your facial features or fingerprint) for authentication. Adding an extra layer to authentication keeps IT resources secure by requiring more information to verify that the user attempting to gain entry to their resources is authentic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Of course, there are other ways to secure IT resources, such as enforcing password policies. But no matter how complex a policy requires a password to be, a user\u2019s credentials can still be stolen or otherwise compromised. Two-factor authentication can prevent threats from being introduced to a network in the first place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Two-factor authentication ensures digital identity thieves can\u2019t get further than the login screen without access to a user\u2019s second form of authentication. This supplementary form of authentication can take the form of an SMS code sent to their smartphone, biometric data, TOTP tokens, or a USB key. Some versions are more secure than others, which we\u2019ll get into later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2FA is critical in preventing account takeovers and data breaches. For example, in 2019, the data of 190,000 Docker<\/a> users was exposed. Many employees expressed concern on social media and forums about the company\u2019s reluctance to implement 2FA after the incident, causing speculation that the breach was due to a lack thereof.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bad actors frequently acquire user credentials via phishing attempts or brute force techniques. Though 2FA doesn\u2019t block bad actors from making these attempts, it prevents them from being able to access IT resources without a secondary form of authentication. Companies that leverage 2FA can save themselves up to $8.19 million <\/a>per incident in damage control as a result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Although 2FA is proven to protect organizations against credential threats, there are some disadvantages and weaknesses. One of the main disadvantages is that it impedes user authentication efficiency. Depending on the delivery method, a user may wait a few seconds or up to 10 minutes to receive their 2FA token.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In terms of security, not all 2FA methods are created equal. SMS 2FA is one of the least secure, as seen in the Reddit data breach<\/a> of 2018. Bad actors were able to access Reddit user data and a 2007 database backup of salted and hashed passwords by intercepting a user\u2019s SMS token.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
JumpCloud, the world\u2019s first cloud-based Directory-as-a-Service, partnered with Cisco Duo, so admins can require 2FA in the form of biometrics, SMS codes, TOTP tokens, or physical keys \u2013\u2013 per their organization\u2019s requirements. This comes along with many other identity and access management features admins can use to keep their organization secure. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Want to know more about how to use JumpCloud for 2FA? Schedule a demo<\/a> or register for a free account<\/a>. For any questions, feel free to reach out<\/a> to us.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"