{"id":43623,"date":"2020-01-05T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-01-05T16:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jumpcloud.com\/?p=43623"},"modified":"2024-12-19T17:15:17","modified_gmt":"2024-12-19T22:15:17","slug":"universal-directory-vs-azure-ad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jumpcloud.com\/blog\/universal-directory-vs-azure-ad","title":{"rendered":"Universal Directory vs Azure Active Directory"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
In the battle for modern directory services, are Okta\u00ae<\/sup>\u2019s Universal Directory (UD) and Microsoft\u00ae<\/sup>\u2019s Azure\u00ae<\/sup> Active Directory\u00ae<\/sup> (AAD or Azure AD) worth considering? For most, though, UD and AAD aren\u2019t used as the replacement to a true directory service, like Microsoft Active Directory<\/a>. Regardless, given the activity in the identity and access management (IAM) space, it is worth understanding the comparison between Universal Directory vs Azure Active Directory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n UD and Azure AD weren\u2019t intended as replacements for an organization\u2019s on-prem AD, but rather a complement to the identity provider. Both cloud identity management services allow admins to extend AD identities to web applications through single sign-on (SSO)<\/a>. Below, we\u2019ll compare features of both UD and Azure AD. We\u2019ll also detail the components that define a service as a modern, cloud-based directory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Okta introduced Universal Directory<\/a> as a way to build upon their established foundation of web application single sign-on services. Over time, Okta extended UD to serve as a repository for user information from a variety of sources, so that UD acts as the subsequent authority for a user\u2019s data attributes. It\u2019s also a core underlying feature for admins looking to leverage Okta\u2019s SSO<\/a> capabilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Azure AD<\/a> is a cloud-based user management solution for Azure and Office 365\u2122. Beyond Azure\/O365 management, Microsoft also created it to provide IT admins with web application SSO from the cloud. Azure AD is designed to work as an extension of Active Directory, connecting users to various web applications, Azure infrastructure, and Office 365. In order to bridge on-prem AD to Azure AD, a component called Azure Active Directory Connect is required and then subsequently if Azure resources are needed to be accessed, Azure AD Domain Services is required as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Like Okta, Azure AD is a great resource for admins looking to extend user credentials to web applications, but it isn\u2019t generally considered a standalone solution. As a result, IT departments layer Azure AD on top of their existing AD and associated connective technology described above. All of these solutions come with their own complexities and subscription fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n These solutions are often quite useful when viewed from a different context. Universal Directory serves as a foundation for Okta\u2019s web application single sign-on platform, and Azure AD is the user management solution for Azure as well as a web app SSO platform.<\/p>\n\n\n\n More than likely, when comparing these two solutions, IT admins are looking at their excellent web application single sign-on capabilities and comparing them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If IT admins are considering these solutions as cloud directory services, then the comparisons can be quite different. For example, Azure AD serves as an extension to the on-prem Active Directory solution, which is considered a true directory service.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Regardless, IT admins would be wise to detail their critical requirements when choosing a cloud directory, whether that involves these two solutions or others. For most IT organizations, a cloud directory service is often viewed in the context of AD and building upon that foundation, except it exists in the cloud and is useful for modern IT environments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For those looking to replace or update an instance of AD, IT admins actively seek out a solution that can connect users to all of their IT resources including the Windows-based resources that AD works well with. That often means that admins desire support for authentication and authorization to Windows, macOS\u00ae<\/sup>, and Linux\u00ae<\/sup> systems, cloud and on-prem server environments (e.g. AWS\u00ae<\/sup>), web and on-prem applications via LDAP and SAML<\/a>, physical and virtual file servers (Samba file servers, Box, G Drive\u2122, etc.), and WiFi and VPN access through RADIUS.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In addition to controlling access to these resources, modern cloud directory services should follow in the footsteps of Active Directory with GPO-like functions for not only Windows, but macOS and Linux as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n IT organizations may have other critical requirements for their cloud directory service and evaluating all of the solutions against that expanded list is important for finding the best fit.<\/p>\n\n\n\nUniversal Directory vs Azure Active Directory<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
UD vs AAD as Single Sign-On<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
UD vs AAD as Cloud Directory Services<\/h3>\n\n\n\n