{"id":43280,"date":"2021-10-11T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-10-11T15:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jumpcloud.com\/?p=43280"},"modified":"2024-11-14T17:55:13","modified_gmt":"2024-11-14T22:55:13","slug":"sso-vs-ad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jumpcloud.com\/blog\/sso-vs-ad","title":{"rendered":"Single Sign-On (SSO) vs Active Directory (AD)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

There are many identity and access management (IAM) tools available, ranging from point solutions to more comprehensive solutions \u2014 i.e., platforms. Point solutions focus on very specific pieces of the IAM puzzle, rather than the big picture, like single sign-on (SSO)<\/a>. Platforms can be comprehensive and integrate with a vendor\u2019s other tools, or even have significant gaps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, Okta offers a strong SSO solution, but lacks unified endpoint management. That\u2019s significant because IAM is no longer separate from device management. Consider whether you\u2019d want a user to access confidential company information from a kid\u2019s gaming PC. You probably wouldn\u2019t. Taking device health\/posture into account is part of Zero Trust<\/a> security.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s understandable that making a choice for your organization can be difficult and confusing. As IT organizations dive into their research, one common question that they begin to ask is, \u201cWhat\u2019s the difference between SSO vs. Active Directory (AD)?\u201d This article explains the differences in important factors like user productivity, security and admin efficiency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is Active Directory?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Microsoft Active Directory is the historical, market share leading, on-prem commercial directory service. Many IT organizations rely upon AD as their core identity provider (IdP) for authenticating resource access to Windows-based systems and applications. AD is offered as a complementary facet of Windows Server.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are an assortment of added services available from Microsoft which, when combined, create the AD domain. The domain traditionally consists of any on-prem, Windows-based systems and applications managed through AD.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As Microsoft\u2019s core identity and access management solution, naturally, AD works well in traditional Windows-centric networks. However, AD struggles when non-Windows or cloud-based resources come into play. A few common examples of resources that Active Directory struggles to connect and manage include Google Workspace, AWS, Salesforce, and Dropbox. Of course, the problem gets worse as IT organizations consider the use of macOS and Linux systems, Wi-Fi and VPN networks, on-prem file servers, and much more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Cloud Problem<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The rise of the internet brought many innovations to the IT industry, one of which was the emergence of web applications. This event presented a major drawback for AD: web apps, which require identity management for proper access and security, exist outside of the traditional domain. To deal with this problem, Microsoft added another solution to the list of AD add-ons, called Active Directory Federation Services<\/a> (AD FS), in 2003. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

AD FS uses the SAML 2.0 protocol<\/a> and WS-Federation to connect an AD identity to web applications. By doing so, AD FS widens the boundaries of the domain to include some web apps, making identity management considerably easier for IT organizations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, AD FS proved to be costly for admins because it\u2019s housed on-prem and requires a server farm, making it difficult to implement. It requires a lot of additional work to maintain on top of added licensing costs. AD FS comes with hidden maintenance costs, adds unnecessary complexity to the IT landscape, and comes with security risks if used straight out of the box. Add to that the plethora of other AD solutions needed to completely manage the entire group of IT resources end users need to access, and management overhead increases dramatically. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some organizations still use AD FS for smart card authentication, but Entra ID, Microsoft\u2019s cloud directory offering<\/a>, supports it now. Even Microsoft recognizes that AD FS can be too unwieldy<\/a>. Most modern IT infrastructure is increasingly cloud-resident, or at the very least hybrid cloud.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n \"JumpCloud\"\n <\/div>\n
\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n Securely connect to any resource using Google Workspace and JumpCloud. <\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n Learn More<\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n

What is Single Sign-On (SSO)?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In response to the challenges of products like AD FS, third-party vendors created more functional solutions to help extend AD identities to cloud-based and\/or non-Windows resources like web applications. These vendors leveraged SAML 2.0 to extend AD identities to the cloud and created SSO tools, also known as first generation Identity-as-a-Service<\/a> (IDaaS) solutions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coincidentally, the original web application SSO solutions hit the market at almost the exact time as AD FS. Since Microsoft has always emphasized expansion in the computing space, SSO vendors<\/a> sharpened their product, giving AD\u2019s native tool a run for its money. However, most of the competition for AD FS early on was with other on-prem, enterprise-class solutions. Over time, web application SSO solutions shifted to the cloud.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As a result, today\u2019s SSO solutions are more refined, and they can be used as add-ons to a core directory service or<\/em> <\/strong>as built-in functionality within a modern directory platform. The latter option eliminates the need for IT teams to manage an on-prem directory service like AD as well as a separate web app SSO solution. Some platforms have even integrated device management to take a more comprehensive approach to securing access control and identities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Consider if you can have everything under one platform with more flexibility and functionality, why would you choose anything other than platform consolidation?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Comparing AD and SSO<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Let\u2019s examine AD and SSO side by side. AD and SSO are very different; one is an on-prem directory service \u2014 the authoritative source of identities, the other a cloud-based, web app identity extension point solution that federates the identities from a core directory to web applications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AD FS and SSO, however, are very similar. Both solutions federate on-prem identities to cloud applications, filling a great need in modern identity management. Their core differences lie in the fact that AD FS exists on-prem while most SSO tools now live almost exclusively on the web.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Microsoft has broadened the role of AD FS on-prem with their Entra ID in the cloud. Entra ID is primarily a user management tool for identities in the Azure cloud suite, as well as Microsoft 365<\/a> (formerly Office 365). However, it\u2019s also been extended to work with external identities for some workflows. What\u2019s possible with Entra ID is largely driven by your subscription level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Entra’s capabilities have grown significantly since it was introduced, but this approach still misses non-domain bound IT resources (outside of web apps) and non-Windows solutions, requiring additional AD add-ons that further embed organizations in on-prem infrastructure. Intune, another Microsoft subscription, extends management to non-Windows devices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Microsoft\u2019s reference architecture promotes both AD on-prem and Entra in the cloud along with connective technology called Entra ID Connect, showcasing how entrenched (both technologically and financially) an organization must remain within the Microsoft ecosystem to leverage these capabilities. Notably, several security products<\/a> are required to prop up AD in order to keep identities and corporate data safe. Doing it right can become very costly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Big Question: Do You Need Both AD and SSO?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

For admins working in modern IT environments, it\u2019s clear that you need both a core directory and an SSO solution because each one addresses a different issue. However, there is a way to maintain a combined solution of a modern core IdP with SSO capabilities<\/a> that allows users to leverage one set of credentials to access a wide variety of apps and resources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The short answer to the question of whether you need both AD and SSO is: it depends. Some organizations would benefit from containing and modernizing AD. Others can migrate a cloud-based directory<\/a> solution that seamlessly federates identities to other IT resources. For example, JumpCloud can extend AD to web apps but also federates Google and Okta identities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

JumpCloud\u2019s Open Directory Platform<\/a> provides IT organizations with the ability to manage their users, cross-OS devices, applications, networks, storage systems, network infrastructure, and more, all from the cloud. As such, this cloud directory platform gives IT admins a couple options.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Replace AD<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Most organizations can migrate to a modern cloud directory, allowing them to take advantage of the cloud, efficiency, and security.<\/p>\n\n\n\n