{"id":14967,"date":"2023-01-23T11:16:18","date_gmt":"2023-01-23T16:16:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.jumpcloud.com\/?p=14967"},"modified":"2024-11-08T16:40:40","modified_gmt":"2024-11-08T21:40:40","slug":"active-directory-vs-okta","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jumpcloud.com\/blog\/active-directory-vs-okta","title":{"rendered":"Active Directory vs Okta"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Between the proliferation of Mac and Linux systems and the move to cloud-based resources, the IT landscape has witnessed a tremendous amount of change over the last two decades. These changes have many IT organizations wondering if they can continue to manage their modern environment with the long-time leading identity provider, Microsoft Active Directory<\/a> (AD), or if they should look into cloud identity management solutions like Okta<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n If you\u2019re in an Active Directory vs. Okta situation, the next question that arises is: how do you decide which solution is best for you?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well, in the case of Active Directory vs. Okta, it\u2019s actually pretty easy, because they are two very different solutions. That being said, it\u2019s not exactly fair to compare the two, because AD is a core identity provider, while Okta is a web app single sign-on (SSO) provider. So, let\u2019s take a closer look at Active Directory vs. Okta and the difference between an identity provider<\/a> and a web app SSO<\/a> solution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In general, Active Directory is focused on being the primary user store for an organization, while Okta is meant to be the web application single sign-on portal for users. In fact, the two integrate tightly whereby Okta receives Active Directory identities, which it can subsequently federate to web applications. With that being said, SSO is not complete identity management<\/a>, it\u2019s merely a small, but important, part.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This approach to identity and access management (IAM)<\/a> has been a staple for the last few years. Because AD has been the directory services solution of choice for a long time, Okta really had no other option than to build its solution on top of Active Directory. So, IT admins have leveraged the two together to solve their problems. <\/p>\n\n\n\n With Active Directory, IT admins have been able to control Windows-based systems and on-prem applications, and by integrating Okta with AD, they gained the ability to federate access to web applications through Okta. However, this stitched-together IT solution surfaces new problems that IT has had to find ways to deal with, and it isn\u2019t ideal for many modern organizations that prefer a cloud-forward, integrated approach to identity and access management. <\/p>\n\n\n\n This begs the question: Are IT organizations better off eliminating Active Directory, and leveraging Okta\u2019s Universal Directory instead?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The short answer is: No. Okta\u2019s Universal Directory is not a replacement for AD.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Unfortunately, Okta cannot serve as a total replacement to Active Directory. This is because AD serves as the identity provider for Windows systems, applications, file servers, and networks. Okta then uses those AD identities to federate users to web applications. Shifting to Okta as a cloud directory service will result in admins losing significant control, including the ability to manage the systems, on-prem apps, file servers, and networks that AD touches. <\/p>\n\n\n\n AD works best managing Windows-based systems and on-prem applications, and increasingly, more and more add-ons have been needed to accommodate it. These add-ons include identity bridges, multi-factor authentication, privileged identity management, governance solutions, and much more. Okta cannot help with all of this functionality, which means it is not a replacement for AD.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Plus, the complexity that the ever-evolving IAM landscape<\/a> has brought to modern IT environments results in a higher total cost of ownership (TCO)<\/a> for IT admins when they use AD and Okta together, rather than a comprehensive IAM solution. Not to mention that the more solutions are layered on top of one another, the more work there is to do \u2014 be it help-desk requests or mitigating general security hazards.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe Difference Between AD and Okta<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Why You Can\u2019t Replace Active Directory With Okta<\/h3>\n\n\n\n