{"id":108618,"date":"2024-04-08T09:14:41","date_gmt":"2024-04-08T13:14:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jumpcloud.com\/?p=108618"},"modified":"2024-08-15T13:38:03","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T17:38:03","slug":"how-to-convince-to-move-away-from-active-directory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jumpcloud.com\/blog\/how-to-convince-to-move-away-from-active-directory","title":{"rendered":"How to Convince Your Manager to Move Away from Active Directory"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Microsoft\u2019s Active Directory (AD) has been a mainstay of information systems for over 20 years, but it was intended for a different era of computing and business requirements. Its persistence affects IT\u2019s agility, impacts security posture, and limits IT\u2019s capacity to provide the best-of-breed tools that employees expect. The cost of modernizing AD to Microsoft\u2019s specifications can be startling; however, inaction raises operating costs at the expense of IT\u2019s agility and efficiency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Admittedly, it can be difficult to convince managers that a problem exists or that change is warranted. This article will explain how to align IT\u2019s desire to move beyond AD<\/a> with the interests of decision makers. It outlines the impact AD can have on your organization and equips you with the negotiation skills necessary to \u201cget to a yes.\u201d Let\u2019s start by outlining the trouble with AD.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There are hard and soft costs associated with continued reliance on AD. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Hard costs can include hardware, networking, licensing (including broad adoption of Microsoft security services), and facilities expenditures. You\u2019ll also continue to encounter end user requests that are difficult to implement due to AD\u2019s limitations, which can lead to further hard costs in the form of hardware, networking, and licensing for other<\/em> products. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The indirect costs vary and may be harder to quantify; they can reduce your flexibility, cause cultural resistance, and even make it more difficult for your organization to obtain cyber insurance coverage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n AD wasn\u2019t intended to manage anything other than Windows devices within a main office or set of satellite locations. This is not how modern organizations operate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Today\u2019s workplaces consist of cross-OS endpoints<\/a> and work happens everywhere. AD doesn\u2019t provide single sign-in<\/a> (SSO) for cloud apps and network resources without additional components, lacks modern authentication and phishing resistance<\/a>, and has no built-in conditional access<\/a> (CA). AD is built around the network perimeter versus emphasizing the significance of every asset, resource, and even access requests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Its technical limitations also make on\/offboarding users more cumbersome and prone to human error. There\u2019s no automation of group memberships<\/a>, and entitlements are all manually assigned. It\u2019s very easy to overprovision users, and even waste licenses, due to the nature of inherited group permissions. IT efficiency is limited by AD\u2019s lack of automation and difficulty in handling modern workflows. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The end result is that IT isn\u2019t responsive to business requirements; or worse, it actually impedes them.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe Full Cost of AD\u2019s Legacy<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
AD Isn\u2019t a Business Enabler<\/h3>\n\n\n\n